Another unfounded assumption I've noticed in the discussion of Sarah Palin. Everybody seems to assume she's lying now about having "said thanks but no thanks" about the "Bridge to Nowhere". But could she not have been lying when she claimed to support the bridge while running for Governor, instead? She might be completely honest about her position on the bridge, now!
Take that, liberal media!
Posts
1 comment:
Her lips said "yes" but her eyes said "no".
The thing is, when she saw the check, she said "No, thanks" to the bridge, but then kept the money. And still went ahead with the road to nowhere that led to the bridge to nowhere.
Maybe it wasn't "thanks" but "where"?
And my security letters are "fofqleek". That's fafblogian word if there ever was one, which there isn't, because I made up "fafblogian". :)
Post a Comment